Atlas of Biological Work is a name for an open-ended, locally adaptable and participatory framework and mapping platform for questions about the fundamental energy flows, cycles, and processes that underlie our civilization, and how we influence them over time. The Atlas consists of:
- Transparent, repeatable, local measurements and observations of fundamental ecosystem functions such as soil health, watershed function, carbon and water cycling, the circle of life (wholes more than parts).
- Participatory and collaborative human efforts that collect, frame, and interpret this kind of data. These social processes can evaluate programs, projects, and policies in terms of large contexts or wholes such as people, land, and money. They can actively recognize local possibilities and opportunities that have a basis in biophysical reality (even if imperfectly measured). They can take responsibility for soil health and watershed function, and learn to work with the incredible power of the circle of life.
- The design, tools, and technology that facilitate and enable these.
feedback: the guidance of a system based on actual performance rather than expected performance.
This is the kind of shared intelligence we need, and the Soil Carbon Challenge, people using the web app atlasbiowork, Rancher-to-Rancher, and some citizen science projects embody one or more of these elements.
But we typically do the opposite! This is what the Atlas of Biological Work is NOT:
- A focus on parts: problems, symptoms, species, best management practices, and wedge issues such as carbon "sequestration," cattle and methane, glyphosate, organic or regenerative certifications, zoning, weeds, pests, etc. We spend trillions on soil erosion, sedimentation, nutrient leaching and runoff, wildland fires, the war on weeds and pests, endangered species, flood mitigation, and drought relief. We devote mere pennies to underyling causes such as the acceleration of water cycling or the lack of soil aggregation. Data is often inaccessible and doesn't show change over time.
- The questions are narrowly framed by experts, institutions, and organizations, often with vested interests in treating the symptoms. This results in forecasting, "education" on best management practices, and rule-based systems that override or neglect the imagination and creativity of land managers.
- Design, technology, incentives, and funding that keep the framing and participation narrow, maintain competition between the parts and the problems, and keep data in separate silos (such as water issues and soil issues).
As Buckminster Fuller noted, "You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete." We intend for this new model, Atlas of Biological Work, to be broadly collaborative, localized, based on observations, and helping to connect stakeholders and assets around soil health and watershed function. We invite suggestions and collaborators on any or all of the three elements (email below). We're interested in working with anyone, including local conservation districts, landowner groups, and watershed groups to begin or extend their efforts in the what, why, and how of the Atlas:
- What: the observations and measurements themselves
- Why: the need for participation and broad, flexible framing
- How: design, technology, and tools
Learn how to use web app atlasbiowork
Download a short booklet on the Atlas of Biological Work